|
Sign up to be notified
about new content.
We do not
support any type of spam. Your email details will not be shared and
will be protected. |
|
Ethical Investing vs.
Socially Responsible Investing
by: Davor Miskovic
Is there a difference between Ethical Investing and Socially Responsible
Investing (SRI)? Several terms are used when referring to the practice of
using ethical, non-financial criteria in choosing investment
opportunities: social investing, socially responsible investing, green
investing, ethical investing and so forth. What is the difference and
which one should be used?
Hudson (2005) distinguishes ethical investment from other practices in
that the ethical investor is very much interested in returns, whereas
socially directed investment will accept “below-market” returns in order
to contribute to some form of social or economical activity that is highly
valued by such socially directed investors. Schwartz’s (2003) study builds
on this concept by questioning the nature and extent of ethical investment
and argues that a lot of issues that pass for ethical investment are more
likely to be social or political.
Because ethics can be sometimes very personal and undefined, and may
vastly differ among individuals, it is not an easy job to designate all
issues within ethical investing as ethical or non-ethical. Especially when
issues like worker’s rights, environment, treatment of women and so forth
arise, they may encompass the ethical framework of an individual. “It made
sense to call SRI ‘ethical investment’ when it described people investing
along with their personal values in unit trusts or mutual funds. It makes
less sense to describe pension fund investment as ‘ethical’, whereas
‘socially responsible’ seems to fit them much better” (Sparkes 2002:23).
Woodward (1999) notes that avoiding certain investments on moral grounds
may explain the use of the word “ethical”. The difference in terms may
also emerge in regards to the quoted source, as it appears that “ethical”
investment is the term used in UK reports and studies, whereas “socially
responsible” investment prevails in those of U.S. origin (Woodward 1999).
In conclusion, the term “socially responsible investment” seems to be more
appropriate when referring to the practice of using moral criteria in
selecting investment opportunities, as it does not depend on individual
preferences. However, in light of previous arguments, the terms “ethical
investment” and “socially responsible investment” can also be treated as
synonyms.
Another key segment of SRI that should make our understanding even more
complete is the comprehension of the
historical development of Socially Responsible Investing.
References:
Hudson, R. (2005). ‘Ethical Investing: Ethical Investors and Managers.’
Business Ethics
Quarterly 15 (4), p. 641-657.
Schwartz, M. S. (2003). ‘The
“Ethics” of Ethical Investing.’ Journal of Business
Ethics 43 (3), p. 195-213.
Sparkes, R. (2002). Socially Responsible Investment – A Global Revolution.
Chichester, UK:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Woodward, T. (1999). 'A Review of the Nature and Significance of Ethical
Investment in
the United Kingdom.' The Current State of Business Disciplines 3, p.
1317-1330.
|